Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
Rev. bras. ginecol. obstet ; 37(10): 486-491, out. 2015. tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-762024

ABSTRACT

OBJETIVO: Verificar a adesão à dupla contracepção entre mulheres infectadas pelo HIV usando acetato de medroxiprogesterona de depósito (AMPD) e condom.MÉTODOS: Corte transversal realizado em centro de referência de dezembro 2013 a setembro 2014. Entrevistadas 114 mulheres HIV (+), 15 a 49 anos, em uso de AMPD e condom para contracepção, aplicando questionário clínico epidemiológico, construído após painel Delphi e validação de conteúdo.RESULTADOS: As médias foram de 33,2±7,2 anos de idade, 8,1±5,2 anos de detecção do HIV, 6,8±5 anos de uso de terapia antirretroviral (TARV) e 737,6±341,1 células CD4/mm3. Adquiriram HIV pelo sexo 98,2% (112/114). Identificadas 85,9% (98/114) usuárias de TARV e 77,7% (84/114) com CD4>500/mm3. Relato de parceria fixa em 78,9% (90/114), havendo sorodiscordância para HIV em 41,2% (47/114), status sorológico do parceiro desconhecido em 21,9% e o parceiro desconhece que era infectada em 37,7% (43/114). Última gestação não planejada referida por 71,9% (82/114). Engravidaram no último ano 14,9%, sendo 70,5% (12/17) não planejadas. Relato de uso atual de AMPD em 64,9% (74/114) com sangramento genital em 48,2% (55/114) e ganho de peso em 67,5% (77/114). O uso de condom masculino foi referido por 62,2% (71/114). Três usuárias de condom feminino sempre e dez eventualmente. Tinham sexo desprotegido vaginal 37,7% (43/114) e anal, 32,4% (37/114). Relato de resistência do parceiro para usar preservativo em 30,7% (35/114). A dupla contracepção com AMPD e condom foi relatada por 42,9% (49/114). Resistência do parceiro para usar condom foi associada com má adesão (RP=0,3; IC95% 0,2-0,7; p<0,001). Parceiro desconhecer a infecção da parceira pelo HIV favoreceu a adesão (RP=1,8; IC95% 1,2-2,7; p=0,013).CONCLUSÃO: Neste estudo, adesão à dupla contracepção com AMPD e condomfoi de 42,9%, mantendo gestações não planejadas e sexo desprotegido. Resistência do parceiro para usar condom aumenta três vezes a chance de a mulher não aderir à dupla proteção e parceiro desconhecer a infecção da mulher quase duplica a chance de ela aderir. Metas: ampliar oferta de novos contraceptivos e envolver parceiros na contracepção e testagem.


PURPOSE: To determine adherence to dual contraception using depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) and condom among HIV-infected women.METHODS: A cross-sectional study carried out from December 2013 to September 2014 at a local reference center, with application of questionnaire elaborated after Delphi panel and content validation to 114 HIV(+) women aged 15 to 49 years, using DMPA plus condom for contraception.RESULTS: Mean age was 33.2±7.2 years, mean time since HIV detection was 8.1±5.2 years, mean time of antiretroviral use was 6.8±5 years and mean CD4 cells/mm3 count was 737.6±341.1. Sexual HIV acquisition was reported by 98.2% (112/114), antiretroviral use by 85.9% (98/114), and 77.7% (84/114) had a CD4>500/mm3 count. Having a single sex partner was reported by 78.9% (90/114), with HIV serodiscordance in 41.2% (47/114) of couples, 21.9% did not know the serological status of their partner and in 37.7% of cases (43/114) the partner was unaware of the HIV(+) status of the woman. The last pregnancy was unplanned in 71.9% of cases (82/114) and 14.9% of the women had become pregnant the year before, with pregnancy being unplanned in 70.5% (12/17) of cases. Current use of DMPA was reported by 64.9% (74/114), with genital bleeding in 48.2% (55/114) and weight gain in 67.5% (77/114). Use of a male condom was reported by 62.2% of the subjects (71/114). Three reported that they always used a female condom and ten that they eventually used it. Unprotected vaginal sex was reported by 37.7% (43/114) and unprotected anal intercourse was reported by 32.4% (37/114). Partner resistance to use a condom occurred in 30.7% of cases (35/114). Dual contraception using DMPA with condom was reported by 42.9% (49/114). A partner who resisted wearing a condom was associated with poor adhesion (PR=0.3; 95%CI 0.2-0.7; p<0.001). A partner who was unaware that a woman was infected with HIV favored adherence (PR=1.8; 95%CI 1.2-2.7; p=0.013).CONCLUSION: The percentage of dual contraception using DMPA plus condom was 42.9%, maintaining unplanned pregnancies and unprotected sex. Resistance of partners to use a condom increased three times the chance of a woman not adhering to dual contraception, and the partner not knowing women's HIV infection almost doubled the chance to adhere to safe contraception. Goals: to offer new hormonal contraceptives and to involve the partners in contraception and serologic detection tests.


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Condoms , Contraceptive Agents, Female , HIV Infections , Medroxyprogesterone Acetate , Patient Compliance/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , HIV Infections/prevention & control , HIV Infections/transmission
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL